{"id":891,"date":"2015-11-22T05:29:18","date_gmt":"2015-11-22T05:29:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/?p=891"},"modified":"2021-03-21T05:34:07","modified_gmt":"2021-03-21T05:34:07","slug":"bt-brinjal-on-life-support-in-bangladesh","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/blog\/bt-brinjal-on-life-support-in-bangladesh\/","title":{"rendered":"Bt brinjal on “life support” in Bangladesh"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

GMWATCH<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A policy research group has concluded that the GM crop was a \u201cmiserable failure\u201d in its second year of cultivation. Claire Robinson reports https:\/\/gmwatch.org\/en\/news\/latest-news\/16535<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bt brinjal (eggplant) has proved a \u201cmiserable failure\u201d in its second year of cultivation in Bangladesh, according to a new report by the development policy research group, UBINIG. Unimpressed by claims that Bt brinjal has proved a boon to farmers, the group conducted its own field investigations and concluded that this GM crop is on \u201clife support\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The UBINIG investigators obtained a list of 110 farmers growing Bt brinjal made by the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), which is managing the Bt brinjal project in the country in collaboration with Cornell University. UBINIG was able to collect data from 79 \u2013 about 72% \u2013 of the farmers, who were spread among all of the 19 districts in which the crop was grown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bt brinjal nannied<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The UBINIG researchers found that the GM Bt brinjal crops were nannied through their short lives by officials from BARI and the Bangladesh Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE). Their report says, \u201cDuring the field cultivation the farmers were extensively supervised by BARI and DAE officials. The DAE officials at Union, Upazila and district levels visited daily or at least weekly and supervised the growth of the plants.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UBINIG adds, \u201cAccording to the farmers, most of the time, the officials took care of the plants themselves as they had to show a good performance.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to UBINIG\u2019s investigation, the officials even replaced failing plants with new ones. If UBINIG is correct, this is completely contrary to good practice for a scientific trial and in itself would be enough to render the results worthless. It remains to be seen whether the researchers declare this practice in any paper that they publish on the experiment in a peer-reviewed journal. If plants were replaced and the researchers keep quiet about it, that could constitute scientific fraud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Heavy doses of pesticides used on Bt brinjal<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The British author and GMO promoter Mark Lynas has claimed<\/a> that Bt brinjal \u201crequires drastically less pesticide than is conventionally applied by farmers to brinjal\u201d. According to UBINIG, the crop was hyped to farmers as the \u201cno-pest brinjal”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the reality was very different. UBINIG reports, \u201cThe farmers had to use huge amounts of pesticides recommended by the supervising authorities of BARI and DAE. These included Comfidor, Ektara, Admasar, Dithen M-45, Bavistin, Thiovit, Basudin, Furadan, Borax, Demsa granular, Vim powder, Admire, 200sl (Bayer CropScience), bleach powder, Heckel, Salclox, Diazinon, etc. There were many other insecticides and fungicides sprayed, as provided by DAE. In the booklet of BARI, organic pesticides such as Neem seeds, Neem oil, powder soap, Trix, and the chemical pesticides Malathion, Omite, and Baviston were suggested for different pest\/disease attacks.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UBINIG states, \u201cThirty-five types of pesticides, including acaricide [kills ticks and mites], insecticide, and fungicide, were sprayed several times in the Bt brinjal fields\u201d, on the direction of the supervising officials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even banned insecticides were used<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Five banned insecticides were used on Bt brinjal, including Basudin, Bidrin, Dursban, Diazinon and Furadan. These banned insecticides were used in farmers\u2019 fields in Gaibandha, Kushtia, Manikganj, Mymensingh and Sherpur districts. Thirty other pesticides used in Bt brinjal fields were not from the list of 76 pesticides officially recommended for brinjal crop production in Bangladesh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why the chemical arsenal?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

UBINIG found that Bt brinjal fell victim to a number of pests and diseases \u2013 not just bacterial wilt, a problem that even BARI admitted<\/a> to \u2013 but a variety of viruses, fungal infections, insect pests, and mites. Viruses included tulshi and mosaic viruses. Fungi appeared as root rot, stem rot, wilt, leaf spot and fruit rot. Farmers reported heavy infestations of whitefly and aphids in the Bt brinjal. There was also an infestation of red mites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Poor yield and farmer income<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bt brinjal was claimed to be profitable because the yield would not be impacted by the fruit and shoot borer. However, UBINIG says the yield did not live up to the expectations of farmers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those farmers who were able to supply details of costs and income reported losses ranging between Tk. 15,000 (USD 192) and Tk. 30,000 (USD 385). In comparison, farmers cultivating local non-GM varieties could earn between Tk. 70,000 (USD 898) and Tk. 100,000 (USD 1280) from the same size field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Market problems<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Farmers were given signboards to advertise their GM Bt brinjals in the market as \u201cpesticide free\u201d \u2013 a lie, given the high usage of pesticides reported. The brinjals were not labelled as GM, in violation of the terms of approval by the Bangladesh government. UBINIG reports that farmers found it difficult to sell Bt brinjal because it lost freshness more quickly than normal brinjals. Most of the farmers ended up eating the Bt brinjals at home, but the taste was \u201cnot liked\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Farmer verdicts<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

UBINIG collected statements from farmers who grew Bt brinjal in the second year. One called it a \u201cworthless crop\u201d; another said he would not grow it again and would tell other farmers to stay away from it. A farmer in Pabna, Shamsul Haque, said: \u201cI cultivated Bt brinjal with the hope of earning a good return. But in reality I have a big loss\u2026 The DAE officers were right in their statement that there is no fruit borer in Bt brinjal. The fact is that there was no fruit on the plants of Bt brinjal. So there is no object for fruit borers to be there. My land is very fertile. I had lot of options for crops. I incurred a loss of Tk. 15-20,000. So I swear I shall not grow Bt brinjal in future.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Out of 79 farmers in different districts, 58 (74%) declared that due to the losses they had incurred, they would not cultivate Bt brinjal again in the future. Sixteen (20%) of the farmers said they would do so only if the BARI or DAE provided all the support. Only one farmer showed an interest in growing Bt brinjal again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Toxicity hazard<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

No toxicity information has been published on the Bt brinjals that were cultivated in Bangladesh. However, animal feeding trials commissioned by Mahyco, Monsanto\u2019s Indian partner, revealed<\/a> organ damage in rats fed similar Bt brinjals. Epidemiologist Dr Lou Gallagher, who analysed the industry tests, concluded, \u201cRelease of Bt brinjal for human consumption cannot be recommended given the current evidence of toxicity to rats in just 90 days and the studies\u2019 serious departures from normal scientific standards\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Background of secrecy and deception<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second year of Bt brinjal cultivation in Bangladesh has taken place against a background of secrecy and deception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The chief mystery is why it was planted at all. This is because Bt brinjal was widely recognised <\/a>as having suffered widespread failure in its first year of cultivation, with angry farmers demanding compensation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to UBINIG, BARI did not issue any report on the performance of Bt brinjal in the first year of cultivation, leaving the industry lobby group ISAAA as the only body to report<\/a> on the results of the experiment \u2013 and ISAAA\u2019s report is hidden behind a paywall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UBINIG says the second round of cultivation was \u201cnot based on any request or demand from the farmers\u201d. A new group of farmers was recruited who did not know anything about GM Bt technology and were not \u201caware of the debates and the experiences of the farmers\u201d who had already incurred losses in the first round of field cultivation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In view of all the problems with Bt brinjal, UBINIG likened it to \u201ca patient in an intensive care unit under life support\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The UBINIG report<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bt brinjal is under “life support”. UBINIG, Bangladesh: November 2015 (short report<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bt brinjal is under “life support”. UBINIG, Bangladesh: November 2015 (long report<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The image at the top of this article shows the half-barren Bt brinjal plot of the farmer Abul Hossain of Dhanua, Narsingdi, supplied by United News of Bangladesh journalist Faisal Rahman (see also http:\/\/gmwatch.org\/news\/latest-news\/16320<\/a>)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

GMWATCH A policy research group has concluded that the GM crop was a \u201cmiserable failure\u201d in its second year of cultivation. Claire Robinson reports https:\/\/gmwatch.org\/en\/news\/latest-news\/16535 Bt brinjal (eggplant) has proved a \u201cmiserable failure\u201d in its second year of cultivation in Bangladesh, according to a new report by the development policy research group, UBINIG. Unimpressed by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":892,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[33],"tags":[212,208],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/891"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=891"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/891\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":893,"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/891\/revisions\/893"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/892"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=891"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/prabartana.com\/ubinigdemo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}